I suppose there is a fundamental problem in that society can propagate untruths free of liability, but I do wonder how long that will persist under the current political system because it seems to be self-destructive.
Currently, the only motive to pursue this is through potential financial claims against large commercials entities like FB or Youtube.
But sooner or later it seems inevitable that this social movement will bite it's own tail. The first test will be when the wealthy estate of a deceased individual chooses to sue a commercial entity, then perhaps those individuals who were unvaccinated as well.
I know some will argue that there is a burden of proof, but it's actually the anti-vax movement that is diminishing that burden of proof by it's very actions. They'll get what they are asking for, the right to make a judgement based on an unfounded and unsupported opinion. They seem oblivious that the the rules they crave can be turned back on them!
Currently, the only motive to pursue this is through potential financial claims against large commercials entities like FB or Youtube.
But sooner or later it seems inevitable that this social movement will bite it's own tail. The first test will be when the wealthy estate of a deceased individual chooses to sue a commercial entity, then perhaps those individuals who were unvaccinated as well.
I know some will argue that there is a burden of proof, but it's actually the anti-vax movement that is diminishing that burden of proof by it's very actions. They'll get what they are asking for, the right to make a judgement based on an unfounded and unsupported opinion. They seem oblivious that the the rules they crave can be turned back on them!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

