08-20-2021, 12:30 AM
Both the Geelong and Richmond reviews were initiated 6 years after Thompson and Hardwick took charge, not after 2 1/2 disrupted seasons. The Geelong review was initiated in August 2006 (near the end of the season) and included everybody :
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-17/g...ew/1240604
It will look into administration, coaching, fitness, medical and sport science, list management, player leadership, recruiting and welfare and development.
That's how you do a review.
I understand the pro review crowd will extol the virtues of being proactive, getting on the front foot, nipping problems in the bud etc., but there is a fine line between proactive and knee jerk, and I'm not convinced our club understands the difference.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-17/g...ew/1240604
It will look into administration, coaching, fitness, medical and sport science, list management, player leadership, recruiting and welfare and development.
That's how you do a review.
I understand the pro review crowd will extol the virtues of being proactive, getting on the front foot, nipping problems in the bud etc., but there is a fine line between proactive and knee jerk, and I'm not convinced our club understands the difference.