Football Department Review

[Lods]

We look at things like injuries, the improvement in some players, no major blowouts (prior to last week, and given the state of the lineup it was a result many predicted prior to the match). We think to ourselves

'This is all pretty much expected so why the pressure on the coach and others?"

But we look at things from a distance.
We're not sitting there in the team meetings, or mixing with the playing group.
We don't know who is mates with who.
Who belongs to which clique?
Who thinks they're not being rewarded with game time?
Who is driving the show?
We have leaders, do we also have white-ants?

So the question is...
If we can see a logical reason for our position why is there a concern that there are major issues in the football department.
Why do those who have obviously conversed more often with the players feel that a review at a very inconvenient time for coach and players is necessary.