08-16-2021, 05:43 AM
Just doing a small amount of research on the "famous" Richmond review from 2016. I don't recall if they made a public announcement at the start of the review. The article below is dated mid September 2016, and says that the review took over 10 weeks (which I guess we can assume means about 10-11 weeks). Backdating from the article date, it sounds like it may have started early July 2016.
https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/32844...-structure
For those interested in further reading, there's two links below : The first is Peggy O'Neal talking about the journey at Richmond under hers and Gale's watch. The second is a HS article from Big Footy that goes into some detail about the Richmond review. Both well worth reading IMO.
https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/mem...at-culture
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/r...d.1181342/
https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/32844...-structure
For those interested in further reading, there's two links below : The first is Peggy O'Neal talking about the journey at Richmond under hers and Gale's watch. The second is a HS article from Big Footy that goes into some detail about the Richmond review. Both well worth reading IMO.
https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/mem...at-culture
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/r...d.1181342/

