Football Department Review

[PaulP]

I could be wrong but didnt MLG and one other (maybe Sayers) contradict each with one saying "its not about Teague its about reviewing the football dept" and the other said "Teague is part of the football dept therefore he is included" ??

Well, I guess it depends on how you define a contradiction. I think whoever spoke the first quote would have communicated better if he said "it's not only about Teague its about reviewing the football dept.", which I suspect is what he meant. I think the first quote was just bad communication, and the second is actually correct. There's no way you can review a football department and exclude the senior coach IMO.