CV and mad panic behaviour

[flyboy77]

I’ve noticed you tend to project your faults on others. You regularly engage in ad hominem attacks but accuse others of using that tactic. And then you condemn taking “swipes at the man” but you do so immediately after declaring “Those fact check sites are drivel.” Hypocritical at best.

Of course, you know the fact check article we posted didn’t just say “he’s a wanker”. The fact checkers critiqued the good doctor methodically and compendiously. Just to take but 1 aspect:Fancy that: the good doctor makes a bombshell claim that mRNA trials had led to autoimmune disease but when challenged he sought to rely on a paper whose lead author says his paper didn’t support that claim. And experts in the area call Cole out for fearmongering and having no scientific basis for his claims.

And remember this is just one baseless claim amongst others that were methodically  debunked.

Well, well, well, it looks as though the good doctor is nationally recognised as a fraud.

No publications demonstrate that mRNA vaccines cause cancer or autoimmune diseases.

And therefor they're safe?

Gee, that's stellar logic. ROFL. Were you pissed when you wrote  that?

Nationally recognised? By a couple of unknown nobodies....how about discussing the content?

Cole's hardly the only one raising big questions. Robert Malone, who essentially invented the mRNA technology, is another.

Stephanie Seneff, a highly regarded biophysicist another.....

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23

Pfizer's Japanese biodiversification study, in itself, should be ample evidence in itself to halt these vaccines  until further is known.

If you hadn't noticed, mRNA vaccines are brand, shiny new and folk who question them get ostracised, not funded for studies that will likely conclude they're bad.

ADE is the big fear. why had all earlier attempts at making vaccines for corona viruses failed?

https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.640093

By all means bury your brains 8 feet under and refuse to consider the' 'other' side....

As Baggers so eloquently said (paraphrasing), do I really give a toss what you think?

As for your ad hominem allegation, BS.

I work with data professionally, I get data and I can interpret data.

You lot ( a good few of you sadly) just opine without any supporting evidence....it's clear LP has long got way with his bully boy "I know more than you' mantra.....well, that's kindergarten stuff.

I'll leave you with a few simple images.

Interpret them as you see fit.

ps Mav, I suggest you read up on what constitutes an ad hominem attack. Me saying a fact check site is carp is not an ad hominem attack on you. By definition.