07-26-2021, 09:00 AM
(07-26-2021, 08:56 AM)Lods link Wrote:I'd play him....
But I can understand a reluctance.
If things go bad they'll get crucified.
That mightn't be what's right....but is what will happen.
It's also probably a little different playing your first game when all around you on both sides are battle hardened.
And you and your teammates haven't played together under hard match conditions for some time.
If he doesn't play, things will go bad anyway.
We need Charlie for structure. If we don't have structure, we lose, Teague gets sacked (apparantly) players decide they are better off playing elsewhere rather than go through a rebuild. Our older players are retired to make way for younger versions.....we are stuffed.
I'd argue there is more risk by NOT playing him. The risk being the club implodes, rather than Charlie getting injured.
