CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

That looks to be a rather self serving response.

The ad hominem attack - I know more than you so butt out - classic LP.

I can fully see why you think my criticism is personal, I'm criticising global behaviours that you seem to locally replicate!

Oddly there is nothing in the document that you link to support your claims, it's primarily a discussion on the calibration and verification of various PCR systems / methods and how they compare.

Posting lengthy documents to seemingly support spurious claims just by the documents presence, to add a semblance of technical or scientific credibility, it is a fairly obvious and repeated tactic by lobbyist groups going back to the tobacco industry that published pages and pages of documents accompanied by heavily distorted summaries. Of course if anybody actually reads the whole document they quickly know the truth.

Oddly, versions of many of the points I listed are even contained in the very document linked which supports my conclusions, has it not been read by the naysayers or are they just deliberately cherry-picking headlines or a brief segments of the summary to support the distorted conclusions they publish?

It is a bit like arguing infections are up in heavily vaccinated regions, without clarifying the case severity or viral loads, given that many infections in vaccinated individuals only present very mild or no symptoms, it can only be assumed the naysayer claims are a deliberate distortion to try and discredit the effectiveness of vaccines. Reminds me of Pete Evans.