CV and mad panic behaviour

[ElwoodBlues1]

Yes, this is an interesting depiction / version.

You know the author's claims are based on a single clinical trial of only 7,580 dose of Novavax, which she claims delivers more accurate results than the hundreds of millions of doses of Pfizer that have been issued.

Do you think it's odd the article contains no comparison to AZ, given they use the same technology, does that not ring your suspicion bell?

Does a US perspective colour color the resulting conclusions?

As I said early days and I would want more data because the masses will be the lab rats like they have been for AZ and Pfizer etc......didnt think she was pushing the barrow of any vaccines really, dismissed the Johnson from the USA, and praised the other vaccines. Even went on to say that Pharma is a gamble  and that all the vaccines are wonderful just that Novavax in her opinion was better and yep based on a small sample size from the UK.
Very promising but would I be jabbing myself with Novavax right now....No...not until I had more evidence of success in all areas of concern. If it is proven better then I have no doubt it will be priced accordingly and supplies limited which wont suit the world wide rollouts. As I said just another version of the truth to be read and weighed up against all the other versions floating around and I'll make my mind up when the medical jury's around the world can agree..