CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

One with less serious side effects with relation to my/family medical history, that is more effective for longer periods between jabs and that is accepted clearly as the best by Medical opinion universally and not by defined what can produced more cheaply or will assist the time frame of the economic aspirations of the Government in my own country.
Here is another version of the truth......
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archi...ne/619276/

Yes, this is an interesting depiction / version.

You know the author's claims are based on a single clinical trial of only 7,580 dose of Novavax, which she claims delivers more accurate results than the hundreds of millions of doses of Pfizer that have been issued.

Do you think it's odd the article contains no comparison to AZ, given that AZ and Novavax use the same technology, does that not ring your suspicion bell?

Does a US perspective colour color the resulting conclusions, do you think there is just a slight chance it's a paid advertisement for Novavax?

If the millions and now approaching billions of people already vaccinated with either Pfizer and AZ, who are now living healthy lives and getting on with life not enough evidence to satisfy you, what is then?

You made an interesting comment about "being effective for longer", so I presume you don't mean Novavax which is relatively new and as such lacks any longitudinal evidence?