CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

That study is 200 pages long, and I'd guess even if I did read it all, a fair whack would go over my head. Just reading the executive summary, it seems to focus on "children, adolescents and young adults of child bearing age". The first two are obvious enough, but what age group does the last category include ?

When you read lots and lots of these papers you get use to cutting through the padding and going to the specific claims that the conclusions are based on, they have to stand up in the math. But most of them come back to questionable sources like the Yellow Card or VAERS surveys, which is like polling the MCG exit crowd about Toowoomba Local Council Politics, sure some will know what you are talking about but the delirious remainder will just make it up!

Here is a nice (It stands up to scrutiny) critique of Dr HCQ's claim;
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/v...ccullough/

While infection tends to grant better immunity than vaccination most of the time, getting the disease is associated with a higher risk of death and health complications. Vaccines generate immunity in people while avoiding the risks associated with the disease itself. The amount of spike protein generated by COVID-19 vaccination is too low to cause damage.