(07-11-2021, 05:11 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:Some more cherry picking from the UK:Didn't you tell us Delta variant isn't worth worrying about because it's less lethal?
Could it be your ignoring the increased virulence and choosing the bits and pieces of figures you want to support your argument.
Weren't you arguing the lower fatality of Delta variant meant we could open up, and now you're posting something that tells us it kills more even when they are vaccinated?
Or perhaps I should I just highlight the rather dogdy nature of the linked image as shown below;
- I didn't know report was spelt with double "P", as in Repport No.8, I'll correct that for the future.
- Report No.8 was published in Dec 2020, are they predicting the future and quoting figures for future document dates. This seems to be confirmed by the link at the bottom of the image, yet the 3rd line of the charts suggests otherwise, 09/07/2021, innocent mistake or something else?
Figures stripped from various different locations and misused to paint a picture for political purposes I suspect. Looks genuine at first, but is patently a fabrication with just the smallest amount of cross checking exposing the truth about it!
The Brits always get their spelling wrong in official docs, and publish a link to current data with a date 8 months in the past. :

We understand the pain people suffer, we get that the lockdowns are hurting and the concept of vaccination is scary, we feel sorry for people in this situation on all counts, but sources wilfully lying about or ignoring obvious errors doesn't make things right.
It's absurd to claim or assert the government officials and politicians will stand up in the media and report the exact opposite of what their official reports have published in hard copy. It's career ending behaviour, and It doesn't happen.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

