Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2021
#25
It is just so much no9cer doing this after a win!

Carlton vs Adelaide at Marvel
After three ordinary performances in a row, it was very nice to see the Blues get over the line.

Trends:
[1] We had only 12 people voting for this game, which is hugely down for what is normal for a win. Usually when we win, we get between 17 – 19 voters. 12 voters is a number more common when we lose.
Hopefully, we can reverse that process next week.

[2] At 8.92, this win was rated among the best we have for the season. A huge increase after last week, where we as bad as we have been this season. Considering the GWS just beat Melbourne, that loss may not have been quite as bad as we first considered. A score of 8.92 is almost a B.

[3] 16 players managed a mention this week, which is a significant improvement over last week.

[4] 4 players managed more than 100 votes this week, double what we got last week. Not only that, but Sam Walsh again had a standout game that scored very highly.

[5] For the 8th time this season Sam Walsh was BOG. That is an outstanding effort. He not been outside the top 10 vote getters in any game this season.

[6] Liam Jones deserves a mention for three straight top 3 performances. He is having a fine season.

[7] 3 players got votes from every voter, Walsh, Jones and Weitering. Three others got close.

[8] Zac Williams continues his improved performances since being moved back into defence. Not yet what we were hoping for, but he is, at least, earning some of his money. Adam Saad, however, is still looking to be our best pick-up at this point. His is attracting votes and is averaging more possessions this year than in any previous one.

[9] Paddy Dow continues his resurrection, getting votes for the 3rd time in a row. This was his best effort for the year to date.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 334
Jones, Liam 227
Weitering, Jacob 157
Saad, Adam 111
William, Zac 85
Dow, Patrick 82
Stocker, Liam 71
Betts, Eddie 63
Kennedy, Matthew 63
Cripps, Patrick 37
de Koning, Tom 37
Curnow, Edward 19
Newman, Nicholas 19
Plowman, Lachlan 11
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 7
Owies, Matthew 4

Progressive Voting:
3762 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1744 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
1299 - McKay, Harrison (0)
1246 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
1242 - Curnow, Edward (0)
1234 - Saad, Adam (0)
1218 - Jones, Liam (0)
742 - Docherty, Sam (0)
537 - Betts, Eddie (0)
315 - William, Zac (0)
312 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
177 - Stocker, Liam (0)
167 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
164 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
118 - Dow, Patrick (0)
117 - Owies, Matthew (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
103 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
64 - Fisher, Zac (0)
59 - de Koning, Tom (0)
20 - Setterfield, Will (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)


Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-22-2021, 10:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-27-2021, 12:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-05-2021, 07:50 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-09-2021, 11:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-10-2021, 12:44 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-16-2021, 12:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 10:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 11:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 01:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 06:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-16-2021, 12:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-22-2021, 02:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-27-2021, 11:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-28-2021, 12:20 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-05-2021, 04:40 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 12:57 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 03:14 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 06:09 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 09:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by PaulP - 06-19-2021, 10:02 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-02-2021, 01:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-05-2021, 04:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-17-2021, 04:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-23-2021, 08:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-29-2021, 09:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-12-2021, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:00 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:02 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-03-2021, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LoveNavy - 09-03-2021, 09:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by percy - 09-03-2021, 10:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-03-2021, 11:22 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-04-2021, 08:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by madbluboy - 09-04-2021, 08:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 09-07-2021, 05:23 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-07-2021, 06:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-07-2021, 11:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-07-2021, 11:45 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-08-2021, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)