Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2021
#24
Carlton vs GWS
Another huge disappointment where our players didn’t turn up. We had some good patches, but we just didn’t have the desire on the day.

Trends:
[1] With another poor effect, the voters were pushed away. Only 10 people voted. This is a very low number.

[2] The rating was 5.67, the lowest score for the year. We’ve got used to us being competitive, so this effort was poorly received. 5.67 represents an E-.

[3] Thirteen players managed to get a mention, which is reasonable, but the spread of relatives low scores represents the fact that we didn’t have a lot of winners on the day.

[4] Only 2 players managed more than 100 votes. They were Matthew Kennedy and Patrick Cripps.

[5] This was Sam Walsh’s worst game of the season, with 10th being his lowest finish and 20 being his lowest number of votes. On the other hand, it was Kennedy’s best effort by some margin and his 1st BOG.

[6] Only one player, Kennedy, managed to get votes from every voter. That says a hell of a lot. Cripps and Jones attract most voters.

Votes:
Kennedy, Matthew  249
Cripps, Patrick  127
Jones, Liam  87
McKay, Harrison  72
Stocker, Liam  61
Pittonet, Marc  55
Saad, Adam  52
Weitering, Jacob  49
Owies, Matthew  46
Walsh, Sam 20
Dow, Patrick 19
Fisher, Zac 12
Docherty, Sam  3

Progressive Votes:
3427 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1577 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
1299 - McKay, Harrison (0)
1223 - Curnow, Edward (0)
1209 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
1122 - Saad, Adam (0)
991 - Jones, Liam (0)
742 - Docherty, Sam (0)
474 - Betts, Eddie (0)
290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
249 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
229 - William, Zac (0)
199 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
180 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
114 - Owies, Matthew (0)
106 - Stocker, Liam (0)
104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
103 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
64 - Fisher, Zac (0)
56 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
36 - Dow, Patrick (0)
22 - de Koning, Tom (0)
20 - Setterfield, Will (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Walsh retains his lead of close to 2000 votes. Weitering has solidified 2nd spot, but after that things are relatively close between 3 players.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-22-2021, 10:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-27-2021, 12:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-05-2021, 07:50 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-09-2021, 11:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-10-2021, 12:44 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-16-2021, 12:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 10:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 11:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 01:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 06:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-16-2021, 12:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-22-2021, 02:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-27-2021, 11:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-28-2021, 12:20 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-05-2021, 04:40 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 12:57 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 03:14 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 06:09 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 09:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by PaulP - 06-19-2021, 10:02 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-02-2021, 01:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-05-2021, 04:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-17-2021, 04:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-23-2021, 08:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-29-2021, 09:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-12-2021, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:00 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:02 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-03-2021, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LoveNavy - 09-03-2021, 09:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by percy - 09-03-2021, 10:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-03-2021, 11:22 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-04-2021, 08:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by madbluboy - 09-04-2021, 08:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 09-07-2021, 05:23 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-07-2021, 06:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-07-2021, 11:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-07-2021, 11:45 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-08-2021, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)