(07-01-2021, 05:03 AM)LP link Wrote:[member=105]Thryleon[/member] Nobody is diminishing the severity of the situation, and how painful this is.
But you write and post like the flipside of this action is a rainbow of happy outcomes, when in reality in some cases there will only be degrees of suffering!
Alysa's case is valid in the context of the warning [member=122]Mav[/member] offered about social media, it is too easily used and manipulated to discourage people from being vaccinated without discussing the risk of not being vaccinated. These are perfect examples of a logical fallacy / false equivalence.
The flipside of not being vaccinated to reduce the risk of a vaccine side-effect, is not guaranteed long lived happiness, in fact the risk of a bad outcome from not being vaccinated is greater.
I dont know if you can prove I have written anything of the sort, but from memory I dont believe i have made that assertion.
If anything the inverse is true and you can apply that one at yourself. You seem to think that the vaccine movement is fine, and there is not one bad outcome to be had, and that they are statistically outliers. The thing is, you can manipulate the data to show this, and we both know that.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson

