CV and mad panic behaviour

[Thryleon]

Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value?

Not wanting to diminish real world side-effects, it seems somewhat arbitrary how they are allocated and goes along political lines as some suggest, the biggest tell is the absence of claims from certain segments which the statistics suggest are equal, some are just not covered by the media / social media.

In the USA under the VAERS system, they uncovered a bunch of infant deaths attributed to Sars-CoV-2 vaccinations, of course infants do not get such vaccinations but that is the problem with voluntary reporting, it's hijacked by bogus content just like social media. These reports are analogous to claiming 5G killed my baby, and in effect they are either a prelude to a spurious compensation claim or the sign of a significantly damaged psyche.

Some humans are just awful awful entities whether it is deliberate or accidental!

The Australian numbers for vaccinations of AZ are as follows, as reported by the head of the AMA;So in Australia it's 0.5 deaths per million from attributable vaccine side-effects, even better than the UK!

Social media hysteria put into overdrive by a tricky and selective reporting from the professional media.

Possibly true.

I am not the sole source of knowledge on all things Vaccines, and dont pretend to be.

The hardest part, is pulling apart the various half truths, mis truths and qualifiying arguments to use the statistics.  Like you said the raw data doesnt lie, but if recorded differently, it can tell a different story.