CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy.

Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value?

Not wanting to diminish real world side-effects, it seems somewhat arbitrary how they are allocated and goes along political lines as some suggest, the biggest tell is the absence of claims from certain segments which the statistics suggest are equal, some are just not covered by the media / social media.

In the USA under the VAERS system, they uncovered a bunch of infant deaths attributed to Sars-CoV-2 vaccinations, of course infants do not get such vaccinations but that is the problem with voluntary reporting, it's hijacked by bogus content just like social media. These reports are analogous to claiming 5G killed my baby, and in effect they are either a prelude to a spurious compensation claim or the sign of a significantly damaged psyche.

Some humans are just awful awful entities whether it is deliberate or accidental!

The Australian numbers for vaccinations of AZ are as follows, as reported by the head of the AMA;

Australian Medical Association President Dr Omar Khorshid said AstraZeneca was a safe vaccine.

“No scientists that I’ve heard has said that AstraZeneca is a dangerous vaccine, because, yes, there are serious risks, but they’re one in 40,000. And the death rate [from clotting] in Australia is less than one in two million,” he said.

“The reason [ATAGI changed the advice] is because the benefit side of the equation changes. This idea that there’s so much more risk in vaccinating young people is just not true.”

So in Australia it's 0.5 deaths per million from attributable vaccine side-effects, even better than the UK!

Social media hysteria put into overdrive by a tricky and selective reporting from the professional media.