Football Department Review

[LP]

As the President said
It's not all about Teague.
Although folks seem to be concentrating on that aspect at the moment.
(Perhaps worrying about the tree rather than the forest.)
It's about the football department as a whole.

As I recall the club were at pains to say that the replacement of Bolton was just a step in the continuation of the rebuild.

Teague isn't even in the field of view, he is so irrelevant to the history influencing this debate he should be excluded from the review.

The club's silence on this matter is a disgrace, it reeks of internal politics, it reeks of Teague not having the full support of the board.