Yeadon, a hero of the anti-vaxxers, builds many of his claims on a single false premise, which he repeats ad nauseam.
That false premise is that someone with a high enough viral load to be contagious and shed virus as a super spreader would be too sick to work or circulate in society. I believe he has made that claim in all his main videos, of which there are several versions of the same subject, although I have not personally watched all of them to confirm that.
This concept of someone with a high viral load being too sick to spread disease is the base false premise on which nearly all his other spurious claims such as the infamous "fade away of the pandemic" are based.
None of his supporters question the allegation that the pandemic lockdown might have cost Yeadon and his team as much as an estimated EU$430M, because the lockdown delayed trials of a drug his group had been involved in inventing, a drug to treat eczema. That delay allegedly resulted in the R&D contract expiring before the drug's benchmarks were reached, benchmarks that would have seen him paid in full. Other commentators claim the trials were already showing failed results, and his product wouldn't have made the benchmark anyway because it's efficacy was poor. Bad luck for him, bad luck for his investors, another failed bet, but this is no reason for him to burn down the house to try and save a scrap of his reputation. I suppose if this is true, he and his consortium can always go and sell his new drug in Brazil, maybe he should sell that to his investors!
That false premise is that someone with a high enough viral load to be contagious and shed virus as a super spreader would be too sick to work or circulate in society. I believe he has made that claim in all his main videos, of which there are several versions of the same subject, although I have not personally watched all of them to confirm that.
This concept of someone with a high viral load being too sick to spread disease is the base false premise on which nearly all his other spurious claims such as the infamous "fade away of the pandemic" are based.
Melbourne delivery driver says hello! :o
None of his supporters question the allegation that the pandemic lockdown might have cost Yeadon and his team as much as an estimated EU$430M, because the lockdown delayed trials of a drug his group had been involved in inventing, a drug to treat eczema. That delay allegedly resulted in the R&D contract expiring before the drug's benchmarks were reached, benchmarks that would have seen him paid in full. Other commentators claim the trials were already showing failed results, and his product wouldn't have made the benchmark anyway because it's efficacy was poor. Bad luck for him, bad luck for his investors, another failed bet, but this is no reason for him to burn down the house to try and save a scrap of his reputation. I suppose if this is true, he and his consortium can always go and sell his new drug in Brazil, maybe he should sell that to his investors!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"