CV and mad panic behaviour

[flyboy77]

Watched a video of the the senate committee looking into Covid treatments and Ivermectin was mentioned as achieving positive results overseas and why isnt the TGA looking at it? If I can find the Video I will post it, had a lot of questions on Vaccine safety, legal aspects of the vaccines etc. The Government reps were looking a tad uneasy through it all...

Now LP, if you'd read ANY of the papers I've posted (or watched the videos) you'd learn that you really have zero idea.

But that's ok, I picked you some time back. Learnings aren't necessary for one who knows everything.

The difference between the virus and the (alleged) resultant illness....irrelevant to the effectiveness of Ivermectin.

It can and does stop viral replication and it can also help post the fabled cytokine storm, when punters are on death's door in hospital.

Why isn't the TGA looking at it? Well that's a good question, isn't it.....

Indeed, the potential of Ivermectin to counter CV19 was well known well over a year ago....

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26424.57600/2

And no one is suggesting you use Ivermectin in isolation - again, if you'd bother to read, watch and learn...alas.

Safety?

Safer than houses.

Noting no drug is perfect/ideal in all situations.... https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfd...022lbl.pdf

Yet, if Ivermectin and/or HCQ had been recognised as potentially viable treatments back when - then no EUA would have been possible for the experimental vaccines....

QED.