CV and mad panic behaviour

[Thryleon]

No the officials wouldn't report COVID deaths using the same spin, that is your deliberate personal choice to publish a private perspective which clouds the reporting and not a reality of the statistics. I think what you did there either by accident or design is called muddying the waters!

The numbers are clear, unambiguous and definitive, many of the published opinions of them not so much! :o

No the skeptics would, and the official reported covid deaths in analysis might be a little bit each way.

There is no harm in allowing people to point out the hypocrisy when one point is argued for or against in either circumstance.

the numbers regarding cause of death are never clear, unambiguous and definitive.

Should i retell my fathers demise due to his treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia and the fact that the numbers show that this cancer doesnt kill?  Or should I point to his liver failure as a result of the last cancer treatment where reactivation of Hepatitis C was listed as the official reason for his liver failure?

Without the cancer, his treatment doesnt occur, and therefore his cause of death is null and void.

I expect that the CLL figures are unchanged by that statistic. 

You know what a huge tell is?  Our case numbers are rising, we have seen a nursing home resident test positive and yet she was asymptomatic at age 90.