Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2021
#14
Rd 9: Carlton vs Melbourne
I was disappointed at the time, but our result looks pretty good now. Melbourne are good this year.

Trends:
[1] The rating for this game was 7.51, just a little less than a C-. At the time I was very disappointed, and not a little angry, but our result holds up very well. Only Adelaide (!!!) have done better.

[2] This round we had 4 players get 100 or more votes. That is pretty good for a loss, but again appeared to be pretty even.

[3] We had 3 players who got votes from every voter, with another two that missed from 2 voters.

[4] We had 13 voters this round. Not far off normal for a loss and 3 better than for the same round last year.

[5] Sam Walsh managed his 5th BOG for the year. Docherty had his best result of the year (2nd). In fact, 9 out of the top 10 vote getters were our top vote getters this week.

[6] There were 16 players who got a mention, something we usually only get for a win.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 292
Docherty, Sam 202
Cripps, Patrick 147
Curnow, Edward 133
McKay, Harrison 87
Saad, Adam 78
Betts, Eddie 58
Jones, Liam 43
Cottrell, Matthew 29
Fogarty, Lachlan 14
Stocker, Liam 12
Weitering, Jacob 9
Newman, Nicholas 9
William, Zac 6
Setterfield, Will 6
Murphy, Marc 3

Progressive Voting:
2557 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1170 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
1049 - McKay, Harrison (0)
984 - Curnow, Edward (0)
840 - Saad, Adam (0)
727 - Jones, Liam (0)
673 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
503 - Docherty, Sam (0)
354 - Betts, Eddie (0)
290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
149 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
109 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
100 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
81 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
48 - Owies, Matthew (0)
40 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
12 - Stocker, Liam (0)
9 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
6 - Setterfield, Will (0)

Sam Walsh is almost 1400 votes ahead at this point. Those numbers are Judd-like.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-22-2021, 10:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-27-2021, 12:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-05-2021, 07:50 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-09-2021, 11:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-10-2021, 12:44 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-16-2021, 12:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 10:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 11:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 01:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 06:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-16-2021, 12:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-22-2021, 02:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-27-2021, 11:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-28-2021, 12:20 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-05-2021, 04:40 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 12:57 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 03:14 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 06:09 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 09:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by PaulP - 06-19-2021, 10:02 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-02-2021, 01:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-05-2021, 04:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-17-2021, 04:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-23-2021, 08:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-29-2021, 09:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-12-2021, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:00 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:02 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-03-2021, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LoveNavy - 09-03-2021, 09:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by percy - 09-03-2021, 10:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-03-2021, 11:22 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-04-2021, 08:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by madbluboy - 09-04-2021, 08:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 09-07-2021, 05:23 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-07-2021, 06:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-07-2021, 11:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-07-2021, 11:45 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-08-2021, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)