Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2021
#9
Round 6: Carlton vs Brisbane
Another one of those games that we could have won, but didn't.

Trends:
[1] The rating this round was 7.07, which represents a D. It is probably a little low for a team that got so close to a certain finalist, but there is only so much heartache that we can tolerate.

[2] This round we had 4 players get more than 100 votes, a considerable improvement over the Port Adelaide game.

[3] This round we had 2 player who got votes from everybody. Two others missed by one or two voters only. Sam Walsh and H were the two that were unanimous, and they deserved their ratings with fine fines. Jones and Ed Curnow were the two that missed by a voter or two.

[4] We had 14 voters this round, down from 17 for the same round last year, but the same as last week. We won’t get many more until we start winning.

[5] There were 10 players who got a mention this week. This is very much one of the down-points for this game. We had a lot of players who didn’t make much of an impression for this round. Last week 13 players managed to get a vote in an inglorious display.

[6] Sam Walsh continued his fantastic season with his 3rd BOG result. He has been BOG in half the matches he plays, something that is Don Bradman-like. H was in the top 3 for the 3rd time this year but hasn’t cracked a BOG yet.

[7] Our bigger name recruits failed to fire again this week. That has to be a worry for our match committee. It is certainly something I do not like.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 391
McKay, Harrison 275
Curnow, Edward 141
Jones, Liam 134
Cripps, Patrick 48
Weitering, Jacob 40
Pittonet, Marc 18
Murphy, Marc 5
Docherty, Sam 3
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 3
Cuningham, David 3

Progressive Voting:
1770 - Walsh, Sam (0)
699 - McKay, Harrison (0)
684 - Jones, Liam (0)
625 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
578 - Saad, Adam (0)
523 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
517 - Curnow, Edward (0)
270 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
163 - Docherty, Sam (0)
144 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
124 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
95 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
79 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
55 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
34 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Betts, Eddie (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
3 - Cuningham, David (0)

Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-22-2021, 10:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-27-2021, 12:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-05-2021, 07:50 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-09-2021, 11:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-10-2021, 12:44 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-16-2021, 12:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 10:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 11:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 01:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 06:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-16-2021, 12:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-22-2021, 02:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-27-2021, 11:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-28-2021, 12:20 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-05-2021, 04:40 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 12:57 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 03:14 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 06:09 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 09:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by PaulP - 06-19-2021, 10:02 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-02-2021, 01:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-05-2021, 04:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-17-2021, 04:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-23-2021, 08:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-29-2021, 09:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-12-2021, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:00 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:02 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-03-2021, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LoveNavy - 09-03-2021, 09:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by percy - 09-03-2021, 10:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-03-2021, 11:22 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-04-2021, 08:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by madbluboy - 09-04-2021, 08:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 09-07-2021, 05:23 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-07-2021, 06:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-07-2021, 11:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-07-2021, 11:45 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-08-2021, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)