04-17-2021, 05:51 AM
^^
Firstly, no difference in years developing a vaccine from 12 to 15 or even 20 makes me feel better about a vaccine going from all these stages through to production in 7 months.
If anything, it makes me think its all been a load of crap, and there is no better way for the governments of the world to save face than to latch onto the first vaccine passable.
Secondly, you can use a paraphrased quote of mine to discern nothing about the person's opinion whom I am quoting. It literally is what I interpreted and pass on, therefore if I misquote him, its my lack of expertise on show, not his so to dismiss what I am saying based on that says more about you than him.
What that means for you is, you can assert what you wish, but until you test that question out on your experts end, you cant really make a determination either way, circling me back to my previous point:
For every 5 "experts" in favor of a vaccine, you are likely to find at least one who can form an opinion against it, and that's because there is no concrete answer here. There is no magic bullet, its an anecdotal short term trial to see if this will help, because the statistics show that covid is only bad when its bad, and its not bad 100% of the time for 100% of people, therefore the studies need to contain a certain amount of assumptions built in (such as it will alleviate COVID symptoms in some strains but not all, and the cause of clots has only risen its head in media once the vaccine caused some and not one mention of blood clots came to the fore with all the media we have heard about it until now.
Before you go quoting experts, I believe these are the same type of experts that made the decision to introduce the cane toad to Australia. It seemed like a good idea at the time, and the studies showed that they could help. Right?
Firstly, no difference in years developing a vaccine from 12 to 15 or even 20 makes me feel better about a vaccine going from all these stages through to production in 7 months.
If anything, it makes me think its all been a load of crap, and there is no better way for the governments of the world to save face than to latch onto the first vaccine passable.
Secondly, you can use a paraphrased quote of mine to discern nothing about the person's opinion whom I am quoting. It literally is what I interpreted and pass on, therefore if I misquote him, its my lack of expertise on show, not his so to dismiss what I am saying based on that says more about you than him.
What that means for you is, you can assert what you wish, but until you test that question out on your experts end, you cant really make a determination either way, circling me back to my previous point:
For every 5 "experts" in favor of a vaccine, you are likely to find at least one who can form an opinion against it, and that's because there is no concrete answer here. There is no magic bullet, its an anecdotal short term trial to see if this will help, because the statistics show that covid is only bad when its bad, and its not bad 100% of the time for 100% of people, therefore the studies need to contain a certain amount of assumptions built in (such as it will alleviate COVID symptoms in some strains but not all, and the cause of clots has only risen its head in media once the vaccine caused some and not one mention of blood clots came to the fore with all the media we have heard about it until now.
Before you go quoting experts, I believe these are the same type of experts that made the decision to introduce the cane toad to Australia. It seemed like a good idea at the time, and the studies showed that they could help. Right?
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson