CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

I heard an epidemiologist state we wouldn't see a covid vaccine that works yet here we are less than a year later debating whether or not its worth having.... Yet they are still all greater > 98% effective!
At the end of the day, its all a matter of perspective.  We are all guided by our biases, our personal beliefs, and most dangerously, a statistical analysis that seems to be made with biases in mind, and no real information.  Its amazing how they kept the blood clots and low platelet counts so quiet until the vaccine started yielding similar issues as an example of how little we are told.

Quite convenient for it to come up now isnt it?

I think paranoia knows no bounds, and is a bed fellow of correlation.

btw., An epidemiologist is in effect a type of forensic statistician not necessarily a virologist or immunologist. The two seem to be conveniently and very wrongly interchanged in many public debates.

I notice nobody in the media or social media like to mention that the clotting rates in the vaccinated are still below background clotting levels, which ironically suggests all the vaccines prevent clots. That's something an epidemiologist can comment on, cherry anyone?