Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2021
#6
AFL 2021 Rd 3: Carlton vs Fremantle Updated 16th April
Sorry for the need of an update, but we had a late voter.

Trends:
[1] The rating this week is so much better than last week that the question about which Carlton team went onto the field almost becomes relevant. The overall rating was 9.18, which is almost a B+. Some of us are hard markers.
All of the ratings were from B- to A, nothing higher, nothing lower. That in itself is quite unusual, as we are a very varied bunch are rarely see the game the same way.

[2] This week we have 5 players get 100 or more votes. That in itself is good, but the lowest of those 5 scores was 173! It showed that we had some dominant players who stuck out.

[3] We still showed that we are a bunch of individuals: only 3 players got votes from all voters (Cripps, Jones and McKay). However, three other players had all but one or two voters give them a mention. This is extremely unusual for us when we vote.

[4] This round there were 17 voters, which is a little down for a considerable win. We haven’t had many considerable wins in recent years. Hopefully, we can put away a few more teams this year.
We had 17 voters for this round last year.

[5] We had 13 players get a mention this week, which is a little down on vote getters from recent times. I think it was because we had quite a number of dominant players who deserved a lot of votes, so the borderline cases missed out. There were a number of players who got Honourable Mentions, rather than votes this week.

[6] Liam Jones got his first BOG of the season with a dominant display across half back. Sam Walsh made it 3 top 2 finishes out of 3. Only 2 others, Saad and Gibbons, have managed top 10 finishes in all 3 games this year.

[7] Of our newer players, Fog has managed 11th, 5th and 5th. That is a pretty positive start for the young man.

Votes:
Jones, Liam 305
Walsh, Sam 281
McKay, Harrison 248
Cripps, Patrick 216
Fogarty, Lachlan 173
Silvagni, Jack 70
Gibbons, Michael 22
Docherty, Sam 16
Curnow, Edward 13
Saad, Adam 11
Plowman, Lachlan 8
Newnes, Jack 8
Pittonet, Marc 5

Progressive Votes:
984 - Walsh, Sam (0)
539 - Saad, Adam (0)
424 - McKay, Harrison (0)
393 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
305 - Jones, Liam (0)
255 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
171 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
169 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
117 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
67 - Newnes, Jack (0)
35 - Curnow, Edward (0)
34 - Docherty, Sam (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
16 - William, Zac (0)
9 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Sam Walsh has a commanding lead at this point, but the following pack is strong and improving.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-22-2021, 10:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 03-27-2021, 12:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-05-2021, 07:50 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-09-2021, 11:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-10-2021, 12:44 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-16-2021, 12:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 10:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 04-25-2021, 11:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 01:00 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-15-2021, 06:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-16-2021, 12:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-22-2021, 02:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-27-2021, 11:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 05-28-2021, 12:20 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-05-2021, 04:40 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 12:57 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-17-2021, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 03:14 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 04:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 06-19-2021, 06:09 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 06-19-2021, 09:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by PaulP - 06-19-2021, 10:02 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-02-2021, 01:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-05-2021, 04:55 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-17-2021, 04:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-23-2021, 08:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 07-29-2021, 09:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-12-2021, 10:18 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:00 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 08-29-2021, 04:02 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-03-2021, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LoveNavy - 09-03-2021, 09:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by percy - 09-03-2021, 10:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-03-2021, 11:22 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-04-2021, 08:08 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by madbluboy - 09-04-2021, 08:26 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by Blue Moon - 09-07-2021, 05:23 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-07-2021, 06:25 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by crashlander - 09-07-2021, 09:41 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by kruddler - 09-07-2021, 11:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by DJC - 09-07-2021, 11:45 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021 - by LP - 09-08-2021, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)