CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

I go back to covid for one moment.  We have a small sample size that is heavily weighted to elderly in assisted living/aged care scenarios as the majority of our cases.  Using stats as a study, the numbers and outcomes are a sample size biased by our sample group are they not?  If so, then we actually don't have sound data to form a reasonable understanding of what outcomes we are going to see with respect to covid.

Its not our data we are using its data from abroad.  If we take a moment to realise our population live in vastly different conditions and have a different health profile perhaps we might end up with the stats not telling us much but what scenario we could end up with instead of what we will end up with.

Does that make sense?

No.

The sample size is not small, the disease is global. You can't claim things are different here as an exemption from the global reality.

What sort of ethnicity or society makes someone or some region exempt from the global trend? Even in your own case, the figures in Greece are probably even more relevant for yourself than the figures in Australia, as many risks might be fundamentally genetic, and Greece is in a huge COVID hole!

Critics cannot arbitrarily segment the facts and data, some want to argue against the vaccine based on Norway, then they claim that what happens overseas is not relevant. It's a form of cherry-picking.