CV and mad panic behaviour

[ElwoodBlues1]

But the risk has to be realistically assessed in a relative framework, and I don't think this vaccine risk is being correctly communicated regardless of how it is assessed.

The total statistical figures are not some idealistic perspective, in fact they are the only truth in this matter, everything else is speculation.

It's thousands of times riskier getting in the car and driving to the clinic for the vaccine shot that it is actually getting the vaccine shot. People do that drive by choice everyday day, millions globally make that decision at the moment. I wouldn't try to calculate the death rate from that commute because I would get it wrong, but it must be catastrophic relative to the risk of the vaccine.

Vaccine program is a one size fits all approach geared to herd immunity and with the prospect of losing some of the herd factored in by authorities. Thats all fine as long as its not you or one of your loved ones as that one in the herd that gets picked off.
As long as the majority of the herd are ok, we can keep playing games about the causes of those who do get the clots, the manufacturers can keep doing their own testing and fudging the numbers both with side effects and vaccine efficiency to keep the programs going and the money coming in.
The vaccine program is based around world government economics first and not individual health concerns.The Government have lost a fortune with Job keeper and are not about to give the plebs of the country the more expensive PFizer, Novavax or JJ vaccines. The $4 Astraz jab is what will oil the wheels of the economy better and they dont care if it is part ratsack, magic mushrooms, or causes newborns to grow two heads, thats what the plebs will be having because thats what the country can more afford.