03-30-2021, 11:06 PM
(03-30-2021, 10:47 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:King is the best special comments/ analyst in the caper. Like everyone he gets things wrong but he gets a lot right, he doesn't show any bias if anything he is harder on his own club.
He called the Dangerfield hit for what it was when everyone else said it was an accident.
I don't have Foxtel, so whatever exposure I have to King is from video snippets or articles in the free press. My issue is with the form rather than the content. If he delivered his thoughts without the theatrical die-hard-Cartlon-fan carry-on, it would be a lot better IMO. Listening to him at times, he sounds like folks on here after a bad loss. I don't know whether my tastes are eccentric or pernickety, but him and many others are insufferable far too often. My personal preference is for someone like Daniel Hoyne. He's not a commentator, but I like the way he just presents the data and leaves the histrionics behind :
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/p...hare-tools