03-27-2021, 06:19 PM
(03-27-2021, 02:04 AM)Baggers link Wrote:As I mentioned, even if you have a competent facilitator, have you done your analysis re the fit of your program to the needs of your client? Does your program need change?
Two factors at play (as I wrote of - facilitation person & program adaption to the client needs) and one without the other invites the very real risk of failure of the program. Did the client implement your program thoroughly? Did you get buy-in from the top and all stakeholders?
Too many folks think that the implementation of a program is all they need do - magic bullet thinking, even Saviour thinking... sound familiar? What about fit? What about buy in from the client at all levels? What about follow-up? What about willingness to implement? Did the client 'do the work/really commit?'
As I mentioned, for these programs to work effectively, so much analysis needs be done before, during and after. As for why it didn't work for us (and others) you'd need to look at all of the above... and more. Personally, I've had to 'clean up' after an unsuccessful 360 program (not Leading Teams) on more than one occasion.
Curious.
When was the last time one of these things actually worked in the AFL?
It was all the rage 10-15 years ago.....but the standard line of thinking nowadays is its outdated.
You stated Tigers have done it, not sure when or how often, but the implication would be it was before they started winning flags which would make it 1 team in the past 5 years that it has worked for.
We've seen Adelaide try something, clearly did more damage. Not necessarily the same thing, but it does highlight that kids nowadays are all snowflakes and are less likely to respond to this sort of thing.
Majority of coaches (if not all) nowadays are more like psychologists rather than drill sergeants. Gone is the ranting and raving, instead replaced by calm, logic and reason. Teague fits that bill despite some pining for the alternative.