9/11 Debate

[kruddler]

Without knowing for sure, I can't understand why a building would collapse under its own weight.

I've got no doubt it can, overall the biggest concern is how quickly it did and how easily it did.

There are a few things that bother me about the whole thing.

1. Buildings were designed to withstand a plane crashing into them.
2. Fire has NEVER bought down a skyscraper.
3. Buildings fell down extremely quickly, both in terms of time after they were hit....and once it started.

Official line....
1. Oh yeah, but that plane was slightly bigger.
2. Oh yeah, but the sprinklers were not working....and there was lots of fire.....in each of the 3 buildings.
3. Oh yeah, thats because they are heavy....and there was lots of fire.

Take that further and you see....
- The cleanup was remarkably quick with no real investigation done on the rubble.
- The media all changed their tune almost to the minute.....clearly informed of something.
- Any witness reports that had any contrary evidence were completely ignored.
- All of the passports of the hijackers had their passports found, with barely a mark of fire upon them.

Then if you start looking at the other plane crashes that occurred on 9/11....and you find that there is barely an evidence of an actual plane crash.

....and there are plenty more questions that are not answered, but raise more questions.

And i'm the conspiracy theories for seeking them