9/11 Debate

[kruddler]

There is no vanishing floors, each floor, the ones below and above the impact weighed about 1,450,000kg. The floors falling from above alone has a mass of about 15,000,000kg even without the walls and other structures. The collapsed floors reported would create a void only filled by structural members two or three floors in height, once those structural members fail buckling the next impact of the 10 or more stories above that are collapsing is 2 or 3 floors below, it's not hard to understand. The top floors collapsing at WTC1 or WTC2 were like a dead blow hammer that was 4050sqm and 22,500,000 kg in size.

I understand the concept of pancaking, but it is reliant on all structural members failing in unison (or close enough too) which is not practical.

This is all on the proviso that the structural members were sufficiently weakened to begin with. Talk about the heat/temperature of fires and it getting hot enough to get to 50% structural integrity is somewhat of a best case scenario, but with the redundancy built into the structure, it should still be able to withstand that kind of weight.

On another note, the fire rating of structural members is also something that cannot be agreed upon from 'your side'.
Somewhere it said all asbestos fire rating was removed from the buildings.
Elsewhere it says that the debris was hazardous due to asbestos.

Is it all gone or not?

Did it come down due to no fire rating?? Or is that a cover story?
Did they cite asbestos in the wreckage to keep people away so they could cover their tracks? Why was all evidence in such a big crime ultimately destroyed before any proper investigation could be done?

Do you see why there are many questions over this matter? There would be 100's more..

No one has commented about witness reports and the media blackout on them which followed.