03-21-2021, 05:25 AM
(03-21-2021, 05:07 AM)LP link Wrote:Perhaps, but maybe real physics has called bullsh1t on the faked physics.
Oddly enough, it's the rules published by the patent clerk that proved Newton wasn't quite right! Yet even Newton given access to the video and some background on the rules of encoding would be able to prove the base claim in the WTC7 Conspiracy isn't true!
In the world, 1 solitary second makes a difference!
Speaking of time making a difference.
Ever watched fahrenheit 9/11? I think it was in that, and loose change. They show how the reporting of the events changed with time.
....and no....i don't mean with more information. I mean the first hour or 2 after collapse.....across EVERY channel.
"explosion" "controlled demolition" "bang bang bang"
Every single person interviewed immediately after, all across the airwaves said the same thing.
Within an hour or 2, every single report that went to air changed their tune and all of those comments were never seen again. Instead they managed to find completely different take on things from people. One that was almost word for word what news stations started saying.
It was almost (read entirely) like initially they were reporting the truth and then they got a phone call from the higher ups who changed their tune, and then....somehow magically found....a group of people who had a completely different experience to the people who were interview first.
What possible reason could there be for the complete 180 degree change in reporting of the incident? Any takers?
This is fact. Those recordings are all out there, with times. Take whatever conspiracy theory you want completely out of the equation. Why would the reporting change like that?