(03-14-2021, 12:54 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:The herd immunity theory demands that some of the herd have to be sacrificed... why not keep those sacrificial numbers lower by using the safer vaccines and not the one that is the cheapest, easiest to store and distribute. It's clear the astrazeneca is the worst of the vaccines, why are we being forced into having it when other countries have suspended or scrapped it.Because they aren't necessarily better or safer, and each day that passes does take a fiscal toll.
Why are we not waiting for the Novavax or JJ one dose variety...because they cost more to buy and store?
I'm glad you pointed out that the natural herd immunity approach initially preferred by some requires a sacrifice, Viking style I suppose!
Still serious side effects or death from vaccine derived immunity would be just a fraction of the deaths or serious effects of gaining herd immunity but natural means.
[member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member] What is the evidence that either Novavax or J&J is safer and / or cheaper?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

