CV and mad panic behaviour

[flyboy77]

If you apply the same fiscal rules to HCQ or Ivermectin they are at least an order of magnitude more expensive than the vaccines and yet still functionally ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19 infections! Even Trump knew that, which is why he offered $1.4T for the vaccine, a cheap buy!

Our local good outcome results from the efforts of health professionals and authorities, it isn't proof their efforts weren't needed, the argument you pose is a confusion of cause and effect. We don't have widespread infection because of the efforts of health professionals and authorities, not in spite of their efforts! :o

One hospitalisation costs more than hundreds or thousands of vaccinations, if the rumours are correct about Trump's hospitalisation costing north of $300,000, that money could vaccinate 10,000 people. Trump told the world all Americans were going to get access to his treatment!

Ironic that the Nordic countries went down the GBD path and got severely burnt, now they want a vaccine, but not the one they were offered. I heard a scientist talking about the GDB, which he said was fundamentally flawed because from the very beginning it ignores the 101 basics of virology, that mutations and variants can generally only occur in infected people, vaccines stop mutant variants from developing.

Q is dead, killed by 320 Million vaccinations and counting!

Sweden did not get "severely burnt'. You're making up stuff on the fly now.

75% of their 'COVID deaths' were in the care homes and they admit they should have done better in that context, but it got in before they knew what they were dealing with.....at the start.

Other than that, there is ZERO evidence to support a proposition that their approach was worse than the manic lockdown/masking fear mongering crap many other western nations adopted.

And much to suggest it was better.