(02-04-2021, 08:58 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:Yeah nah, I've stated my point. Its backed up by quite a few others. Feel free to come to my work and have my vaccine for me. They won't know its not me with the mask on and my id with no photo.I fell your uncomfortable answering the question about what might be an acceptable level of evidence.
It's a question designed by Sir Karl Popper to make an debate opponent ponder their own position, especially when an opponent argues they have a position based on evidence without providing evidence. Obviously, when offering a position based on evidence there must be some way to list it, and if evidence sways an opinion there must be some threshold at which further evidence changes that opinion.
Stating more evidence is not evidence at all!
I don't require the answer, it isn't needed, the question is designed to leave you and other observers of the debate pondering what might be viable evidence.
PS; I do not think the poor journalism reporting coincident deaths with vaccinations is backed up by anyone with credibility, as it's an absurdity as I demonstrated in my answer.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

