https://humanorigins.si.edu/education/in...-evolution\
I think Science finds new things to disagree about all the time, and whenever anyone wants to argue that point with me, I point to three points in time.
Erastothanes mapped the circumference of the earth using mathematics and shadows in 240 B.C. Despite this knowledge, Galileo Galilei was labelled heretic as late as the 1600's A.D. for insinutating that the earth was round not flat, and despite all the evidence pointing to the contrary, we have flat earthers in existence today, and if it suited certain political agendas, that would be the truth of the world.
ERGO, Scientific interpretation based on whats common shouldn't be trusted, and the data should be studied individually for people to make up their own minds. The more someone tells me something is true, the less likely I am to believe it.
[member=64]PaulP[/member] , I think the above speaks for what you have stated!!!
Quote:Most scientists currently recognize some 15 to 20 different species of early humans. Scientists do not all agree, however, about how these species are related or which ones simply died out. Many early human species -- certainly the majority of them – left no living descendants. Scientists also debate over how to identify and classify particular species of early humans, and about what factors influenced the evolution and extinction of each species.
I think Science finds new things to disagree about all the time, and whenever anyone wants to argue that point with me, I point to three points in time.
Erastothanes mapped the circumference of the earth using mathematics and shadows in 240 B.C. Despite this knowledge, Galileo Galilei was labelled heretic as late as the 1600's A.D. for insinutating that the earth was round not flat, and despite all the evidence pointing to the contrary, we have flat earthers in existence today, and if it suited certain political agendas, that would be the truth of the world.
ERGO, Scientific interpretation based on whats common shouldn't be trusted, and the data should be studied individually for people to make up their own minds. The more someone tells me something is true, the less likely I am to believe it.
[member=64]PaulP[/member] , I think the above speaks for what you have stated!!!
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson