CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

Some quality propaganda there LP. Gotta keep up the fear right....

Sure Donald, never give up the fight, we get it.

Off the bat, why is it called SARC COV-2? Because it shares so much in common with SARS COV-1 - it really is not 'novel' at all.

Nice twist of terms, complex and novel are not interchangeable.

There is no science to support the proposition the SARS COV2 has any more long term harmful effects than any other significant respiratory illness that overwhelms your immune system (if you let it). Zero.

That is pretty much a straight out lie claiming the opposite of the growing evidence, and as such not worth discussing.

There is also overwhelming evidence that there are several very cheap and highly effective treatments (if given early - pre hospitalisation - who would have thought to treat an illness early!) readily available but largely shunned by the powers that be - and the money machines that are Big Pharma.

Want to name some, with the evidence linking the scientific study that isn't a distorted retrospective meta-data analysis conducted by dodgy profiteers or will you just go back to Surgisphere,...again, sure not ........HCQ, even Donald din't buy that one when he fell ill, or maybe he was given all those complex and speculative treatments against his free will?

Masks? Again, zero evidence that there is one iota of benefit to an otherwise healthy person wearing a mask. Zero. And a lot of evidence that wearing said masks can be, and are, harmful.

But if you take a homepathic blend of GobSnobling you'll be completely impervious to the virus, as well as free to converse with Karens and Coreys everywhere!

It is self evident now (even if not back in March) that COVID19 is a very mild illness in the scale of pandemics over recent millenia. Indeed, in the scale of all things that kill us.

It's mortality rate continues to fall, suggesting the current mutation(s) are relatively benign (which again is the norm for these viruses).

The second wave data has exposed the exact opposite, and the death rate has settled into a fixed percentage of infections, science is closer to defining R[sub]0[/sub] at a stable rate that results from all the prophylactic measures including early intervention, masks, social distancing, not in difference to them! Yet in denialist regions like the US the infections rates go through the roof, 135000 in one day in one Mid-West state, after all the various break-outs to protest the election that must have been coincidence!

A good read here by a very well respected Brit - https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-...-19-biases

Ironic isn't it? Cherry-picking some of the "Types of Bias" and applying them selectively is actually one of the types of bias described, quite bizarre. One in all in! ;D