CV and mad panic behaviour

[kruddler]

Yes, I thought you'd pick up the incorrect gradient comment, sure it's a negative slope blah, blah but you know full well what I meant, just couldn't help yourself.

The rest of your commentary is nothing but emotional BS.

The drop off - there is none. Invalid comment sorry.

Cars on roads stat? You're running with that? Smoked a number tonight?

Accusing Dan.

He's hung himself. Doubt he'll be in Parliament by Christmas.

You're another with this Armageddon alternative logic. Lose it, it's unscientific.

Couldn't help myself??

I'm trying to make sense of your ramblings.
If you are confusing up with down, then what hope do i have finding the logic in your posts?

Cars on road stats, is an example of the effect on what the difference between stages should reflect in the numbers.
Which compared to what you used......ie nothing....is not worth poo-pooing.

No drop off? So the numbers are not going down?? OK. No SIGNIFICANT drop off, perhaps, but it only takes a new breakout to stop that....and given the number of people blatantly flaunting the rules, i'm not surprised.

You're another with this Armageddon alternative logic. Lose it, it's unscientific.

My armageddon logic? I am nothing if not logical.
As i said, if you want to accuse Dan of anything, its being overly cautious.
The armageddon alternative you snigger at.....well ask the italians about taking this thing too lightly.

No one believes that.

How can anyone argue with such a well thought out and articulated scientific rebuttal?!

You have an issue with Dan, so be it, don't twist facts, and ignore others to suit that argument.....and then question other peoples logic.