07-11-2020, 01:16 AM
Rd 5: Carlton vs St. Kilda
Alas, the result was not what we wanted. You could honestly say that we didn't have a 4 quarter player on the night. And we still managed to get close!
Trends:
[1] 13 voters this week, down from 18 the previous week. Not too bad for a loss. We managed 14 voters this round last year.
[2] With a rating of 6.74, this was the worst rating we’ve had all season. This represents a D-. It is probably a reasonable measure of how we played, but we still managed to get within a few goals in the end. Clearly, we are marking harder as our expectations are higher.
[3] Although quite a few players got mentions this week, there was nothing of the evenness we’ve had recently. One player, Jack Martin, dominated the scoring, even though his first half was significantly better than his second. That suggests the majority of the voters were not satisfied by the drop in effectiveness of the team.
Setters also played a mediocre game but managed to garner a lot of votes for similar reasons: he had at least a short period of dominance and was considered to have done his job.
[4] Liam Jones polarized the voters this week. He got none from a number of voters for the bad mistakes which gifted the ‘Aints two goals. Other recognized that he was the most effective defender on the field with 11 marks and the total domination of his opponent.
[5] We did manage to get through the game relatively injury free. That is a big positive.
[6] 13 players managed to get a mention this week. This is normally the sign that we have played well. But that is not the case this week. It is more than a lot of players had small periods of good play.
[7] Unfortunately some players who have been very good for us failed to make a significant impression. Pittonet was down for the first time, Cunners followed up his best game with an invisible one, while Cripps and Docherty were below their best.
Votes:
Martin, Jack 379
Jones, Liam 171
Setterfield, Will 161
Docherty, Sam 73
Cripps, Patrick 67
Gibbons, Michael 57
Simpson, Kade 41
Weitering, Jacob 26
Curnow, Edward 16
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 8
Pittonet, Marc 5
Philp, Sam 5
Newnes, Jack 3
Jack Martin was 200 votes in front of his nearest rival for top spot, which was Liam Jones. Jones just managed to get in front of Setters.
Sam Philp managed to get his first votes.
Progressives:
908 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
717 - Docherty, Sam (0)
697 - Martin, Jack (0)
662 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
529 - Casboult, Levi (0)
442 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
334 - Cuningham, David (0)
328 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
292 - Jones, Liam (0)
253 - Betts, Eddie (0)
238 - Curnow, Edward (0)
175 - Murphy, Marc (0)
172 - Setterfield, Will (0)
98 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
72 - Walsh, Sam (0)
60 - Simpson, Kade (0)
26 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
24 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
8 - Williamson, Tom (0)
6 - Philp, Sam (0)
6 - Fisher, Zac (0)
3 - Newnes, Jack (0)
3 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
Weitering still maintains a solid lead of a group of potential contenders.
Martin moved up into 3rd place.
Alas, the result was not what we wanted. You could honestly say that we didn't have a 4 quarter player on the night. And we still managed to get close!
Trends:
[1] 13 voters this week, down from 18 the previous week. Not too bad for a loss. We managed 14 voters this round last year.
[2] With a rating of 6.74, this was the worst rating we’ve had all season. This represents a D-. It is probably a reasonable measure of how we played, but we still managed to get within a few goals in the end. Clearly, we are marking harder as our expectations are higher.
[3] Although quite a few players got mentions this week, there was nothing of the evenness we’ve had recently. One player, Jack Martin, dominated the scoring, even though his first half was significantly better than his second. That suggests the majority of the voters were not satisfied by the drop in effectiveness of the team.
Setters also played a mediocre game but managed to garner a lot of votes for similar reasons: he had at least a short period of dominance and was considered to have done his job.
[4] Liam Jones polarized the voters this week. He got none from a number of voters for the bad mistakes which gifted the ‘Aints two goals. Other recognized that he was the most effective defender on the field with 11 marks and the total domination of his opponent.
[5] We did manage to get through the game relatively injury free. That is a big positive.
[6] 13 players managed to get a mention this week. This is normally the sign that we have played well. But that is not the case this week. It is more than a lot of players had small periods of good play.
[7] Unfortunately some players who have been very good for us failed to make a significant impression. Pittonet was down for the first time, Cunners followed up his best game with an invisible one, while Cripps and Docherty were below their best.
Votes:
Martin, Jack 379
Jones, Liam 171
Setterfield, Will 161
Docherty, Sam 73
Cripps, Patrick 67
Gibbons, Michael 57
Simpson, Kade 41
Weitering, Jacob 26
Curnow, Edward 16
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 8
Pittonet, Marc 5
Philp, Sam 5
Newnes, Jack 3
Jack Martin was 200 votes in front of his nearest rival for top spot, which was Liam Jones. Jones just managed to get in front of Setters.
Sam Philp managed to get his first votes.
Progressives:
908 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
717 - Docherty, Sam (0)
697 - Martin, Jack (0)
662 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
529 - Casboult, Levi (0)
442 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
334 - Cuningham, David (0)
328 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
292 - Jones, Liam (0)
253 - Betts, Eddie (0)
238 - Curnow, Edward (0)
175 - Murphy, Marc (0)
172 - Setterfield, Will (0)
98 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
72 - Walsh, Sam (0)
60 - Simpson, Kade (0)
26 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
24 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
8 - Williamson, Tom (0)
6 - Philp, Sam (0)
6 - Fisher, Zac (0)
3 - Newnes, Jack (0)
3 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
Weitering still maintains a solid lead of a group of potential contenders.
Martin moved up into 3rd place.
Live Long and Prosper!