CV and mad panic behaviour

[flyboy77]

Any chance of referencing some peer review articles from non-predatory journals that aren't using fake or redundant researcher profiles?

Do you know what Open Access infers?

I suppose probably not, the audited journals are not going to risk their reputation allowing this rubbish to be self-published without peer review.

Nobody is going to seriously claim that HCQ is "the missing link" when it's given with a barrage of other drugs including other powerful antibiotics. Perhaps the circular referencing is a hint, it may be worthwhile spending some time reading up on correlation versus causation, and how much work is required to get from a correlation to a causation, the answers won't be available this year!

Ah, so you resort to ad hominem attack.

The play of the average intellect.

Missing link? wtf does that mean. Multiple observational studies in multiple independent jurisdictions have show the 'blend' to be extremely highly effective if given as an early stage treatment....and in the right dosages.

What, you reckon it's all made up?

Dispute the evidence not the non "peer review journal"...

Should I recount the Lancet's last lame effort to discredit HCQ?

Weak as piss LP. Put up of something of substance or STFU.