Deer in the Headlights

[flyboy77]

So the link opens with;Except Kear allegedly wasn't a climate scientist but a geologist!

He was another like Freeman Dyson (Physicist) who took issue with Human Induced Climate change in his later years, and his self-published articles have been somewhat corrupted to support radical climate denialists. Kear had a right to an opinion as any do, but like Dyson not all opinions are equal and a geologist's opinion is not equal to a genuine climate researcher's opinion. btw., Kear's alleged primary problem with the science was in the language used to describe minimums and maximum measurements, he didn't have much of an issue with most of the actual numbers or measurements presented, and he mostly debates whether warming was human induced or natural occurring, not if it was real!

Is anything you've found to support your opinion going to be accurate?

So tell me LP, who is a climate scientist? What qualifications are required?

Mikey Mann (modeller), Schmidt (god knows), you?

Pray tell?

And again, you play the man. Not the ball.

Didn't you play footy?

Both Dyson and Happer are forces in science, world leading CO2 experts - and you just diss them.