No I don't. You want me to put up the data I will.
All you've done is hit me with rhetoric. Pick a sub set and take a crack with specifics not rubbery words...like isolation.
UAH's most recent satellite data? 0.55C rise in temperature in 41 years. And even NASA admits we're on the cusp of a big GSM.
Ocean acidification (not acidity) - the ocean is basic (alkaline) - always has been and will always be alkaline (even under the impossible RCP 8.5). Acidification is a fear mongering term - a misnomer. They've measured a drop of 0.1 to date (how they measure that on a global scale is moot given day to day and episodal movements in any one location can dwarf that drop).
You want a lesson on the scientific method?
1. Make an observation or observations.
2. Ask questions about the observations and gather information.
3. Form a hypothesis — a tentative description of what's been observed, and make predictions based on that hypothesis.
4. Test the hypothesis and predictions in an experiment that can be reproduced.
5. Analyze the data and draw conclusions; accept or reject the hypothesis or modify the hypothesis if necessary.
6. Reproduce the experiment until there are no discrepancies between observations and theory. "
AGW has failed, consistently at step 5. Fact. Or even at 4 in reality as all the fear is a function of the modelling and sfa else.
End of the day it's the alarmists, in fact, who deny and it's the alarmists who cherry pick.
Clearly your back ground includes little or no knowledge of the geologic timescale - I suggest you brush up on that
And yes, as a matter of fact, if the models have no ability to predict - they are all but useless - and a massive waste of taxpayers' money.
You should listen to Freeman Dyson, one of the great thinkers of the modern era. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hswLwqR...YhtHBVuYZc
All you've done is hit me with rhetoric. Pick a sub set and take a crack with specifics not rubbery words...like isolation.
UAH's most recent satellite data? 0.55C rise in temperature in 41 years. And even NASA admits we're on the cusp of a big GSM.
Ocean acidification (not acidity) - the ocean is basic (alkaline) - always has been and will always be alkaline (even under the impossible RCP 8.5). Acidification is a fear mongering term - a misnomer. They've measured a drop of 0.1 to date (how they measure that on a global scale is moot given day to day and episodal movements in any one location can dwarf that drop).
You want a lesson on the scientific method?
1. Make an observation or observations.
2. Ask questions about the observations and gather information.
3. Form a hypothesis — a tentative description of what's been observed, and make predictions based on that hypothesis.
4. Test the hypothesis and predictions in an experiment that can be reproduced.
5. Analyze the data and draw conclusions; accept or reject the hypothesis or modify the hypothesis if necessary.
6. Reproduce the experiment until there are no discrepancies between observations and theory. "
AGW has failed, consistently at step 5. Fact. Or even at 4 in reality as all the fear is a function of the modelling and sfa else.
End of the day it's the alarmists, in fact, who deny and it's the alarmists who cherry pick.
Clearly your back ground includes little or no knowledge of the geologic timescale - I suggest you brush up on that
And yes, as a matter of fact, if the models have no ability to predict - they are all but useless - and a massive waste of taxpayers' money.
You should listen to Freeman Dyson, one of the great thinkers of the modern era. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hswLwqR...YhtHBVuYZc
Finals, then 4 in a row!