If an expert has some significant insight into the cause or solution to a problem they quickly become part of the majority. They do not need to defend there position because the majority are in consensus with them.
This is the opposite of the human induced climate change sceptics, who are continually and increasingly aggressively defending their position because they are in the minority. They try to compensate for this by shouting which seems to influence the weak minded!
This is the opposite of the human induced climate change sceptics, who are continually and increasingly aggressively defending their position because they are in the minority. They try to compensate for this by shouting which seems to influence the weak minded!
(01-07-2020, 06:40 AM)PaulP date Wrote:Even if we entertain the idea that Climate Change is not real (for the sake of the argument), who doesn't seriously believe that we would all benefit from better and cleaner ways of doing things ? We should change because the new ways are better - that's reason enough.This is the only rational position to take.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

