Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Analysis 2019
#18
Well, this week we really hit rock bottom. Not only was it a terrible performance with few redeeming features, but it inspired only 6 people to vote. I have never seen voter turnout this low. It is barely a third of a our normal voting population.

AFL 2019 Rd 9: Carlton vs GWS in Sydney
A 93 point loss. No excuses. Just poor.

Points of Interest:
[1] Only 6 people voted. That isn't even enough to smooth out the outliers. 16 voters voted this round last year (for another ordinary loss). Just not good enough.

[2] Few few players managed to get a vote. Only 8 guys got a mention and only two got a reasonable mention.

[3] This was theĀ  first game this year that Cripps did not get a vote. He till gas an enormous lead, but he played one of his very few really poor games.

[4] De Boer's game on Cripps showed the effect of having a really good player being shut down. We no longer even try that, much to our disservice. We really need someone to play this sort of game for us each week.

[5] The rating was exactly 5.0. Every single voter gave it an 'F'. That is the equal lowest rating I've ever seen.

Votes:
Newman, Nicholas 275
McKay, Harrison 217
Silvagni, Jack 92
Walsh, Sam 83
Kreuzer, Matthew 42
Fisher, Zac 17
Curnow, Edward 17
Casboult, Levi 8

What is there to say? I can at least be happy I didn't see this debacle.
From this point we have 2 choice: this can be our Manzikert, or it can be our Chippenham. I am hoping for Chippenham, but that assumes our leadership can emulate Alfred the Great. What I fear is that they are too much like Romanus Diogenes (the Roman Emperor who lost at Manzikert, a battle the Empire was never to truly recover from). Sad

Progressive Voting:
2500 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
890 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
781 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
688 - Walsh, Sam (0)
634 - McKay, Harrison (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
572 - Thomas, Dale (0)
567 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
530 - Fisher, Zac (0)
353 - Curnow, Edward (0)
323 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
308 - Murphy, Marc (0)
286 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
179 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
130 - Cuningham, David (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
100 - Casboult, Levi (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
79 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
63 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
20 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
10 - Simpson, Kade (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Live Long and Prosper!


Messages In This Thread
Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 03-23-2019, 09:39 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 03-30-2019, 11:46 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 04-05-2019, 06:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 04-13-2019, 02:03 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 04-19-2019, 12:59 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 04-27-2019, 12:13 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by flyboy77 - 04-28-2019, 04:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by Jack Burton - 04-28-2019, 05:12 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by madbluboy - 05-01-2019, 10:40 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by Professer E - 05-01-2019, 11:37 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by ElwoodBlues1 - 05-02-2019, 01:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by Professer E - 05-02-2019, 02:46 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by flyboy77 - 05-02-2019, 07:28 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by DJC - 05-02-2019, 10:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 05-04-2019, 12:36 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 05-10-2019, 11:29 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 05-21-2019, 10:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 05-25-2019, 01:21 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 06-04-2019, 10:30 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 06-10-2019, 10:28 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 06-18-2019, 10:33 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 06-28-2019, 12:13 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 07-08-2019, 10:58 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 07-18-2019, 10:17 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 07-24-2019, 08:27 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 08-01-2019, 10:24 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 08-03-2019, 05:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 08-13-2019, 11:35 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 08-22-2019, 08:51 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 08-31-2019, 05:36 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 09-23-2019, 01:37 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 09-23-2019, 01:53 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by Jack Burton - 09-23-2019, 04:54 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by LP - 09-23-2019, 05:01 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by flyboy77 - 09-23-2019, 05:59 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by DJC - 09-23-2019, 10:16 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by sandsmere - 09-24-2019, 12:38 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by dodge - 09-24-2019, 12:43 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by ElwoodBlues1 - 09-24-2019, 01:40 PM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by percy - 09-25-2019, 06:15 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by crashlander - 09-25-2019, 08:48 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by Professer E - 09-27-2019, 06:04 AM
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - by LoveNavy - 09-29-2019, 12:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)