If Not BB, Who?

[ElwoodBlues1]

Who does the review?
Who decides whether to follow through with the recommendations of the review?
Who decides what action to take against those who initiated the plan in contrast to the reviews recommendations?

1: Independent review panel headed by a Brian Cook or similar.
2: The club/board are paying for a review, I expect the board and president to follow through and I would
have a member of the review panel attached to the board to monitor progression and the club to have regular follow ups.
3: Those who initiated the plan who were still in office after the review along with any new staff employed would initiate
the new recommendations. This isnt the Waffen SS we are conducting a review not a purge.

Could the act of going through a review actually destabilise the club?
Could fingers start to be pointed at others both prior and post review period to the point where every man is looking after themselves first and team second?
Could peoples focus be taken off the prize of making Carlton better, and go into self preservation mode instead?

(a) I would see a review as a Catalyst not destabilization ...turnarounds in a business usually require a bit of blood on the floor according to Warren Buffet
(b) Possibly....but if you are doing your job you have nothing to fear.
© We are a long way from any prize apart from a spoon, the review will determine if we are getting better and see(b)