If Not BB, Who?

[kruddler]

You have just indicted you dont have faith/trust in MLG, indicated you dont want Mathieson/benefactors involved, and indicated the club are not to be trusted on acting on the recommendations of a serious review.
On that basis how can you trust any type of decision making that the club make now or in the future? Surely a Independent review is the only way to go and a figure like Brian Cook wouldnt be a bad candidate to be part of or lead that review? as we both seem to agree he has credibility and experience.

No, what i have said is not a personal opinion. I am asking the question of you.

Basically, those in charge believe they are doing the right thing because they are the ones that have done it.
Based on that, what makes you think that they will change tact, and go AGAINST what they believe to be true, because some 'random' tells them too?

Hey, they might swallow their pride and take it all on board and make some changes that ultimately leads to a flag or 6. But they might stay the course too and ignore any or all recommendations....and that might lead to a flag or 6 too.

So the question i ask is....
Who does the review?
Who decides whether to follow through with the recommendations of the review?
Who decides what action to take against those who initiated the plan in contrast to the reviews recommendations?