If Not BB, Who?

[ElwoodBlues1]

In most corporate environments a review is not intended to be transparent and open, a review won't be approved until it's phrased to deliver the preferred outcome! It's usually a smokescreen for doing something that would otherwise be seen as uncomfortably cruel or morally questionable!

Agree, but this isnt BHP, Wesfarmers or Myer we are talking about this a football club in trouble who should be genuine in its attempts to improve a failing business.
If we feel there are likely smokescreens, contrived outcomes or political games then its start at the top and weed out those individuals who wont embrace a transparent or open review, those types are part of the problem. eg MLG, Board members, Judd, Mathieson etc etc......