04-08-2019, 07:08 AM
(04-08-2019, 06:31 AM)LP link Wrote:I'd assert that Phillips and Lobbe suffer because we tried to solo ruck them against superior opponents, but in tandem they may have delivered us a better result.
As much as I like McKay long term, ignoring his contested marking stats, Phillips might almost be as effective resting inside F50 yet be a far superior ruck rotation.
If we are going to rob Peter to pay Paul, to me that makes better sense, a Lose/Win seems better than a Lose/Lose!
btw., Don't take my debate wrongly, I think there are short term and long term considerations. I just not sold on burning the short term for the long term benefit, I don't think the long term benefit is anywhere near certain enough to fully scorch the present.
I dont know about that. Lobbe and Phillips are one trick ponies from where I sit, and they are only passable at that trick. I dont think they can play as forwards, and any attempt to do so would halve our effectiveness.
This is where Rowe might have been a better option to keep.
Anyway, I digress. Without Kreuzer we are simply towelled up too much in the ruck. Sinclair smashed us by himself on saturday with very little support.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson

