SSM Plebiscite

[PaulP]

OK then perhaps you'll help us by explaining it to everyone, hopefully in plain language?

Avoid the highfalutin stuff if you can, but make it relevant to the everything, you know cosmology, and not a closed system!

In fact I'm happy for your to talk about any of the laws of thermodynamics, can we start by declaring how many there are, 3 or 4 it's a 50/50?

PaulP, the deeper you go the bigger the goose you make of yourself, not to everyone because not everyone cares or wants to discuss it. But you obviously do, so if you want to do so at least make an effort to get the basics right.

This is the point of the debate when most give up, you've made a spurious claim exposing your ignorance on the subject matter. Rees and Dawkins don't, they continue to dig deeper and if you persist they actually hope they can push you in the sensible direction, they won't give up on you because even if they can't save you from yourself PaulP, they can use the experience as a learning curve to save others! ;D

So do I take that as an answer to my earlier question, there are apparently material scientists and "others?"

Oh that is funny, coming from the guy who made a Hitler/Sheldrake comparison.

You cannot, and will not, explain anything simply because it will mean people might actually understand you, and therefore work out you have nothing to say.